🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.