🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.